You can dramatically improve the handling of your vintage ride with some comprehensive upgrades, including modern shocks.
Want your classic to handle like the latest from Ducati or Honda? That might be putting the bar a little too high, but you can dramatically improve the handling of your vintage ride, particularly if it’s from the Seventies and Eighties, with some comprehensive upgrades.
Compared to modern bikes, vintage motorcycles typically have pretty unsophisticated suspensions. During the 1970s, engine power — and by default top-end speed — developed at an accelerated rate, yet suspension improvements were slow in coming.
My 1983 Laverda RGS1000 is a prime example of this. With something like 75 rear-wheel horsepower on tap the Laverda isn’t exactly a powerhouse by modern standards. But it’s not exactly slow, capable of 125mph-plus speeds and quarter-mile sprints in the mid 12-second range. Unfortunately, the Laverda’s chassis isn’t quite up to its powertrain. Soft springs and poor damping allied with high friction forks leave the front end with a bad tendency to pogo, especially on small, repetitive bumps. The rear has the same buckboard characteristics, courtesy of a pair of vintage Konis, replacements for the original and notoriously poor-performing air-charged piggyback Marzocchis.
I can deal with less than ideal suspension on a bike I only ride a few miles every now and then, but I like to take the Laverda on all-day 500-mile jaunts, and the poor suspension was starting to blunt my enjoyment. Looking for a solution, I put the issue to Matt Wiley, the vintage go-to guy at suspension specialists Race Tech. A fixture at vintage-ride race events around the country, where he helps racers sort their suspension woes, Matt has earned a justifiable reputation for knowing how to make old suspensions perform well.
The problem, according to Matt, is simply one of technology. The Laverda has 38mm Marzocchi damping rod-style forks typical of the 1970s and 1980s. Damping rod forks are limited in performance and ride quality due to their simple orifice-type damping, where a series of holes control oil flow for damping. And despite the fact that road bumps — and riders — come in all shapes and sizes, the orifices are fixed in size and number, resulting in wide variations in fork compression speed. This is single-stage damping, with one damping rate for all situations. But for proper performance and comfort you need dual-stage, high and low speed damping — and adjustability is a nice plus.
Further, where modern fork legs are hard-anodized to reduce friction between the fork tube and the slider, the Laverda’s sliders are just machined aluminum alloy, typical of the era. And without a bushing carrying the load the sliders work directly against the tubes, shedding aluminum into the fork oil as they move up and down the hard chrome fork tubes. That wear shows up as dirty, gray/black fork oil, contaminated with aluminum oxide worn from the sliders. It becomes something of a feedback loop, with wear accelerated by the increase of aluminum oxide in the oil, further contaminating the oil.
And where modern rear shocks come with a variety of compression and rebound adjustment options, vintage shocks are typically preload adjustable only, leaving pretty much zero tuning options. Leaning on Matt’s expertise, I assessed my options for updating the Laverda’s suspension.
Since I use the Laverda regularly as a commuter and a road bike, Matt encouraged a comprehensive approach, with a complete front end rebuild and a set of modern shocks at the rear.
Following Matt’s advice, I started with having the sliders hard-anodized, an electroplating process that coats every square inch of the slider. Anodizing changes the crystal structure of the metal, increasing the thickness of the oxide layer at the surface. This leaves the inside smooth and slick, while the outside takes on a matte black finish. I wanted to keep the original powder-coated, gloss black appearance of the sliders, so with Matt’s help we went an extra step and “show polished” the sliders — which I had already stripped, media blasted and polished — prior to anodizing. After hard anodizing we stripped the outside of the sliders and had them powder-coated. Even if you only anodize the sliders, Matt says the cleaner and more polished they are before anodizing the better they’ll look when done.
To give my forks dual-stage tunable damping we installed Race Tech Gold Valve Cartridge Emulators. The emulators control low-speed compression damping via bleed ports in the valve plate. An adjustable spring on the main valve controls high-speed compression. This adjustment lets you tune out the “hit” you usually feel on sharp bumps with damping rod forks.
Depending upon the forks, installing the emulators requires varying amounts of machine work to the damping rod, including drilling extra bleed ports. Although we left this part to Matt, it can be done by competent do-it-yourself types without having to send the forks to Race Tech. Some applications (like the Laverda) require a special adapter to fit the emulator to the damping rod, as well as new sealing rings for the damper rod pistons.
There are four valve spring rate options (ranging from soft to hard), with a wide range of adjustment for each one. Once installed, the emulators can usually be removed through the top of the fork for adjustment simply by removing the fork cap and spring with the forks still on the bike. Matt suggested softer springs for the Laverda (specifically, 40 pound “blue” springs), noting it often takes a few adjustments of the spring preload to find the “sweet spot.”
The emulator only controls compression damping. Rebound damping is controlled by fork oil viscosity — the thicker the oil the slower the rebound, the thinner the oil the faster the rebound. Matt says anything from a 5wt to 30wt fork oil can be used to control spring action via rebound damping. Further, the emulator valves can be adjusted to compensate for the thicker oil viscosities often required for proper rebound damping with the damping rod forks. We used Spectro brand 15wt fork oil, which Matt recommends for vintage applications like the Laverda.
We also installed Race Tech fork springs, which must be used with Gold Valve Emulators to meet spring length requirements and to ensure proper spring rates. According to Matt, original equipment springs are typically too long and too soft while dual-rate springs (which he doesn’t recommend) are too long and too stiff. Assuming a 200-pound rider fully geared, we went with Matt’s suggestion of 0.90kg straight-rate fork springs (the springs compress 1mm for every 0.90kg of force) with moderate spring preload to reduce brake dive and utilize more fork travel. These replaced the soft, high preload 0.70kg stock springs, which sacrificed a lot of fork travel with just the rider on the bike.
Pitted, chipping chrome on upper tubes is another source of friction and deadly to fork seals. The RGS’ fork tubes were on the way out, so we replaced them with Italian made TNK tubes. Available exclusively through Race Tech, they’re exact replacements and excellent quality.
At the back, we swapped the tired set of Konis for Race Tech G3-S shocks. Like all G3-S shocks, they were custom built to order with choice of length, features, color, etc. Race Tech’s comprehensive build sheet includes specs for extended and collapsed shock length, swingarm pivot to upper shock mount and swingarm pivot to lower shock mount measurements, rider skill level, intended use, and more.
Instead of bushings, the G3-S shocks feature spherical Heim bearings at their mounting points to ensure the shocks don’t bind. They’re preload adjustable and feature an internal floating piston that separates the oil from the high-pressure nitrogen gas. For full tunability, we ordered our G3-S shock with optional ride height and rebound adjusters. The 100 percent U.S.-made shocks are, as you’d expect, a simple bolt-on replacement.
So what price glory? We did the full strip-down ourselves, replacing steering head bearings while we were in there. Ignoring any labor considerations, Race Tech charges $200 to hard anodize a set of disassembled sliders, more if extra prep work is required. Powder coating added another $200. The TNK fork tubes were $520 a set and the Gold Valve Emulator kit ran $170. We also needed a pair of emulator adapters ($15) and damping rod piston rings ($40). Then you can throw in fork springs ($125 a set), fork seals ($25 a pair) and fork oil ($11 a quart). For the rear shocks, with optional ride height and rebound adjustment and black anodized bodies (silver and black are standard colors), the G3-S shocks were $850. Total all that up and our conversion runs just over $2,200, a not inconsequential sum of money for most of us.
But we went all-out on this project, with the polish, anodizing and powder coating adding significantly to the fork costs. You might not need or want those extras, and if the tubes had been OK it would have been that much cheaper yet. A typical Race Tech vintage fork upgrade with Gold Valves, custom rate fork springs, and wear/tear parts and labor starts at around $500, with anodizing, powder coating and polishing extra. TNK fork tubes vary in price by application, and G3-S shocks start at $599 a pair.
That may seem like a lot of money to put into your suspension, but the payoff is huge. The updates we did completely transformed the Laverda. At the front, damping is now controlled and predictable. Brake dive has been mostly eliminated, rebound control is excellent and pogoing has been rendered a thing of the past, all significantly improving rider confidence. Getting there required only one round of adjustment, which involved dialing the springs on the emulator valves to a slightly softer setting.
And where the rear wheel used to literally hop and skip across road irregularities it’s now absolutely planted. I played with adjusting the rebound, but went back to the initial setting, which is dead in the middle of its range. Frankly, it’s almost hard to believe that simply bolting on a pair of quality shocks can make such an enormous difference.
The ride quality is now excellent, and the increase in contact and control front and rear has made the Laverda so much more satisfying. It now rides and performs the way I always wanted it to, but clearly couldn’t because of inherent limitations in suspension design and function. Is it worth the expense? Absolutely. If you ride a lot and want a lot out of your classic, upgrading your suspension is some of the best money you’ll ever spend. MC